There is power in names, or so we've been taught by myths, legends, and Saturday morning cartoons. Shakespeare might choose to disagree, but every heroic tale gives iconic names to its hero or heroine.
So, when we name something, such as DevOps, we are attributing to it certain characteristics. Those characteristics are unique to practitioners. While certainly this growing group of professionals derives some attributes from its origination as development-focused operations, the combination of preferences for tools, methodologies, and their day to day workstreams make them unique. They are neither developers nor operators.
The respondent base in our State of App Services is always mixed, but weighted toward traditional operational roles in IT: network, security, and system operations. But we are seeing steadily increasing numbers of developers and those who identify as DevOps or Site Reliability Engineers (SRE). Given their unique and increasingly important role in digital transformation efforts, we dove into the data with an eye toward the attitudes, impressions, and preferences of those who practice DevOps.
But before you dive in, we wanted to reiterate that DevOps is unique. If you think they're just developers who write scripts and manage CI/CD pipelines, you'd be wrong. If you thought they were just operations who focus on the development pipeline, you'd also be wrong.
What we've found in the data are unique viewpoints and perspectives on technology—from app services to tools to deficits in security skills, these three groups of professionals have different opinions.
Tools are an integral part of all three groups today, owing to the emphasis placed on automation and orchestration across all domains. While all three groups use a significant number of tools, preferences emerge when we look at usage based on self-identified role.
For example, DevOps are more likely than either ops or developers to use Ansible, by wide margins. They are also slightly more likely to employ custom scripts (usually Python) and prefer GitLab over their developer counterparts’ preference for GitHub.
We also see distinct differences in the preferences each group has for app services. It is true that ops maintain primary responsibility for deploying and operating app services—both in the public cloud and on-premises. Developers have little operational responsibility, but DevOps is gaining as container-native app services grow along with the apps they support. That's important when you look at the characteristics they prefer when deploying app services—regardless of location.
Developers, as has been the case for years, are primarily focused on performance. Interestingly, they agree with ops on breadth of functionality such as a robust set of load balancing options. But DevOps cares little for that, instead opting for ease of use/deployment/operation and cost. Developers, whose primary interaction with app services is likely to be with container-native options, are far more concerned with the ease of integration into the ecosystems in which such apps and app services are deployed and operate.
The uniqueness of DevOps can also be seen in the self-identified deficits across security skills. Half (50%) of DevOps cited network security as their number one security skills deficit, followed by both end point security (41%) and app security (41%). Developers cited app security (49%) as their top deficit, followed by network security (46%) and, tellingly, DevOps (43%). More than half of operations respondents tagged app security as their biggest weakness (56%), followed by network security (41%) and, perhaps owing to their responsibility for deploying and operating app services, public cloud security (39%).
The takeaway here is to not lump together these three distinct groups of professionals. Each has its own set of tool preferences, challenges, and requirements for the app services they deploy and operate.
With that in mind, I encourage you to dig into the State of App Services 2020 DevOps edition for more insights and analysis of those who practice DevOps across the globe.
About the Author
Related Blog Posts
F5 accelerates and secures AI inference at scale with NVIDIA Cloud Partner reference architecture
F5’s inclusion within the NVIDIA Cloud Partner (NCP) reference architecture enables secure, high-performance AI infrastructure that scales efficiently to support advanced AI workloads.
F5 Silverline Mitigates Record-Breaking DDoS Attacks
Malicious attacks are increasing in scale and complexity, threatening to overwhelm and breach the internal resources of businesses globally. Often, these attacks combine high-volume traffic with stealthy, low-and-slow, application-targeted attack techniques, powered by either automated botnets or human-driven tools.
F5 Silverline: Our Data Centers are your Data Centers
Customers count on F5 Silverline Managed Security Services to secure their digital assets, and in order for us to deliver a highly dependable service at global scale we host our infrastructure in the most reliable and well-connected locations in the world. And when F5 needs reliable and well-connected locations, we turn to Equinix, a leading provider of digital infrastructure.
Volterra and the Power of the Distributed Cloud (Video)
How can organizations fully harness the power of multi-cloud and edge computing? VPs Mark Weiner and James Feger join the DevCentral team for a video discussion on how F5 and Volterra can help.
Phishing Attacks Soar 220% During COVID-19 Peak as Cybercriminal Opportunism Intensifies
David Warburton, author of the F5 Labs 2020 Phishing and Fraud Report, describes how fraudsters are adapting to the pandemic and maps out the trends ahead in this video, with summary comments.
The Internet of (Increasingly Scary) Things
There is a lot of FUD (Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt) that gets attached to any emerging technology trend, particularly when it involves vast legions of consumers eager to participate. And while it’s easy enough to shrug off the paranoia that bots...