Designing efficient and secure application delivery services architecture is critical to ensuring a seamless user experience for modern, distributed applications running in the public cloud. Among the numerous components of cloud-native application delivery, the Application Delivery Controller as a Service, or ADCaaS, plays a pivotal role in load balancing, availability, observability, traffic optimization, application protection, and infrastructure automation.
While default ADCaaS tools offered by public cloud providers can be a strong starting point, they might not always align with advanced or highly specific requirements for customization and programmability, scalability, or visibility in your application delivery environment. This article recommends an approach for evaluating and choosing the ADCaaS for your applications running in Microsoft Azure—from leveraging the default tools to exploring third-party native cloud service alternatives.
When selecting an ADCaaS for Azure, organizations must weigh factors like ease of use, scalability, customization, and observability. The right choice often depends on the scale of your environment, the complexity of application delivery needs, and operational priorities.
The default ADCaaS tools offered by your public cloud provider—for example, Azure Load Balancer and Azure Application Gateway in the Microsoft Azure cloud—provide the easiest and most straightforward deployment option. These tools are tightly integrated with the cloud ecosystem, covering many general-purpose application delivery use cases with minimal configuration effort.
Default ADCaaS tools are ideal for small- to medium-scale, more static deployments, where standard functionality is sufficient, and there is no need for deeper levels of customization or advanced application and API connectivity features.
When the default ADCaaS falls short—whether due to lack of advanced customization, scaling limitations, or insufficient visibility—third-party native cloud ADCaaS alternatives from cloud marketplaces become the next viable option. An example is F5 NGINXaaS for Azure, which is designed to deliver enhanced performance, availability, protection, and visibility at scale, improving overall user experience without adding extra complexity and operational toil.
When evaluating a third-party ADCaaS in Azure, consider the following capabilities:
Available from the cloud marketplace, F5 NGINXaaS for Azure is best suited for deployment scenarios requiring enhanced performance, scalability, and visibility without the complexity of managing additional infrastructure. It is suitable for medium- to large-scale, dynamic environments hosting many cloud-native, distributed applications.
For platform and cloud architects, selecting the right ADCaaS requires balancing ease of use, flexibility, scalability, and operational complexity. Begin with the default tools provided by the Azure cloud platform for simplicity and faster deployment. If advanced features, better scalability, or improved visibility are necessary, explore third-party native ADCaaS options from the marketplace, such as F5 NGINXaaS for Azure.
When “as a Service” solutions are not capable of meeting your needs, deployable ADCs in VMs or containers offer greater control, albeit at the cost of increased operational overhead. They are suited particularly well for complex multicloud architectures where consistency and centralized management across multiple environments are key requirements.
The decision ultimately depends on your team’s priorities and capacity. Whether prioritizing simplicity or control, the right ADCaaS can empower architects to build resilient, high-performing, and future-proof application delivery platforms.
To start building modern, resilient cloud application delivery architectures, explore F5 NGINXaaS for Azure in the Azure Marketplace.