A zero-click attack refers to a cyberattack that compromises a system or device without requiring the user to click, open, download, or interact with anything. These attacks exploit how software automatically processes incoming data, allowing malicious code to execute silently during normal operation.
What is a zero-click attack?
A zero-click attack is a type of cyberattack that executes automatically when a vulnerable application, service, or system component processes malicious input. Unlike phishing or drive-by malware, zero-click attacks do not rely on user deception or behavioral triggers. Exploitation occurs during routine background activity and often produces no visible indication to the user.
Zero-click attacks are commonly described using three related concepts:
- A zero-click vulnerability is a flaw in how software handles passive data, such as message parsing, notification rendering, or media processing.
- A zero-click exploit is a technique that exploits a flaw by automatically receiving or interpreting data.
- The payload is the malicious outcome that follows, which may include data access, surveillance, or remote control.
In some cases, exploitation results in zero-click malware, such as spyware or remote access tools. However, not all zero-click attacks deploy persistent malware; some are designed solely for short-term access or intelligence collection.
Common entry points for zero-click attacks include messaging platforms, VoIP services, push notification handlers, image and video parsers, and other background services that automatically receive and process data. These vulnerabilities often stem from memory corruption bugs, parser logic errors, or sandbox escape conditions within trusted system components. From a broader cybersecurity perspective, zero-click attacks reflect a shift away from social engineering toward exploitation of automated workflows that users and systems inherently trust.
Why are zero-click attacks important?
Zero-click attacks are important because they undermine many of the assumptions that security teams rely on to detect and prevent compromise.
- First, they remove user behavior as a defensive signal. Because no click, prompt, or warning occurs, traditional awareness training, endpoint alerts, and user reporting provide little protection. This makes zero-click attacks particularly dangerous for mobile devices and collaboration platforms that continuously process automated messages and notifications.
- Second, zero-click attacks are difficult to detect. Exploitation often occurs inside trusted processes and encrypted communication paths, generating minimal logs or security telemetry. In many cases, organizations only become aware of an attack after data exfiltration or a downstream security breach has already occurred.
- Finally, zero-click attacks are increasingly used in high-impact campaigns. Recent AI security insights point to a shift toward attackers investing in automated, failure-driven exploitation techniques that reduce reliance on user mistakes and scale more reliably across complex environments. While these attacks are often directed at high-value targets such as executives, journalists, and enterprises, consumer devices and the general user population are not immune.
How zero-click attacks work
Zero-click attacks exploit how software automatically processes incoming data under real-world performance and usability constraints. Applications such as messaging clients, VoIP services, and media handlers are designed to receive and parse content without user involvement, creating opportunities for silent exploitation.
Attackers deliver specially crafted data through trusted channels such as message notifications, VoIP calls, push services, or media files. As the data is parsed, a vulnerability in memory handling, logic validation, or protocol implementation is triggered. This may result in unintended code execution or control-flow manipulation. Depending on the platform and component, exploitation can involve memory corruption, integer overflows, logic flaws, or sandbox escape techniques.
Why zero-click attacks are hard to detect
Because execution occurs during routine background processing, zero-click attacks often unfold inside system frameworks or services that security teams rarely inspect directly. The absence of user interaction removes many common detection signals. Indicators of compromise may only appear later as secondary effects, such as anomalous network traffic, unexpected process behavior, or unauthorized data access. This delayed visibility is a defining characteristic of zero-click exploitation.
How to prevent zero-click attacks
Because zero-click attacks leave little or no immediate forensic evidence and do not rely on social engineering, prevention focuses on reducing exposed attack surfaces, enforcing timely patching, and detecting anomalous behavior. These priorities reflect the current best practices for effective defense:
- Keep firmware and software updated
Zero-click exploits frequently target vulnerabilities in operating systems, baseband firmware, and bundled libraries rather than third-party applications. Security patches address unsafe memory handling, privilege escalation paths, and logic errors before they can be reliably exploited. Delayed patching significantly increases exposure, especially after vulnerabilities are disclosed or actively exploited. Organizations should enforce automatic updates, track patch compliance, and include firmware and modem updates in standard maintenance cycles - Use network-level protection and traffic filtering
Network controls can help block the delivery of exploits and the command-and-control communication associated with zero-click attacks. Firewalls, secure web gateways, and DNS filtering can prevent connections to known malicious infrastructure identified through threat intelligence. Network segmentation further limits post-exploitation access if a device is compromised, while network telemetry can support investigation and response. - Restrict high-risk apps and services
Zero-click attacks commonly target applications and services that automatically parse untrusted data, such as messaging, voice, and media-handling services. Reducing the number of enabled communication apps lowers the number of potential exploitation paths. Organizations should turn off non-essential services, restrict media preview functionality, and apply allowlists on managed devices to minimize exposure. - Implement mobile threat defense and zero-trust controls
Mobile threat defense and endpoint detection tools focus on behavioral indicators such as abnormal memory usage, unexpected process execution, privilege escalation, and suspicious network connections. Zero-trust controls further limit risk by continuously evaluating device posture and restricting access based on real-time signals. These approaches help identify compromise even when the initial exploit cannot be directly observed. - Strengthen device hardening and access controls
Device hardening limits the impact of successful exploitation by restricting what compromised components can access. Standard measures include disabling unnecessary system services, limiting background execution, tightening application permissions, and enforcing sandbox isolation. Sensitive data should be protected using secure containers, hardware-backed key storage, and strict access controls. Strong authentication and conditional access policies further reduce lateral movement and data exposure.
Zero-click risks for businesses and enterprises
As stated, for businesses and enterprises, zero-click attacks present a distinct risk because they bypass many traditional security controls and occur without user interaction. Compromise can happen on managed or unmanaged devices, reducing the effectiveness of awareness training, endpoint prompts, and user reporting as defensive mechanisms.
If successful, zero-click exploitation can result in:
- Unauthorized access to corporate communications, including email, messaging platforms, and collaboration tools
- Exposure of credentials and authentication workflows, particularly on mobile devices used for multi-factor authentication
- Surveillance or data exfiltration over encrypted channels that are difficult to inspect
- Lateral movement within enterprise environments by abusing trusted sessions or device posture
Zero-click attacks also complicate detection, response, and compliance. Because exploitation often occurs inside trusted system components and generates minimal logs, organizations may face challenges such as:
- Delayed detection, with compromise identified only after secondary indicators appear
- Limited forensic visibility into when access occurred or what data was affected
- Increased regulatory and legal exposure, especially in regulated industries where breach scope and timing must be clearly established
For enterprises, the primary risk of zero-click attacks is not impact. A small number of compromised devices can expose high-value data and undermine trust in critical business systems.
How does F5 handle zero-click attacks?
F5 addresses zero-click attacks by enforcing security controls at application and network control points where automated data processing occurs, rather than relying on user-driven signals that zero-click exploitation bypasses.
At the application delivery layer, F5® BIG-IP® provides inline traffic inspection and policy enforcement, preventing malformed or malicious data from reaching vulnerable services. By analyzing protocol behavior, request structure, and data integrity in real time, BIG-IP helps identify exploit attempts that abuse trusted application workflows and background processing paths, which are commonly targeted by zero-click attacks.
In distributed and cloud-native environments, F5® Distributed Cloud Services extend these protections across mobile, SaaS, and multicloud architectures, where zero-click exploitation often occurs over encrypted channels and remote access paths. By applying consistent security policies at the edge and close to workloads, Distributed Cloud Services help reduce visibility gaps created by passive data handling and automated service communication.
Together, these capabilities enable organizations to detect threats and enforce policies earlier at critical control points, limiting the blast radius of zero-click exploitation across enterprise applications, remote users, and unmanaged endpoints, even when no direct user interaction or endpoint alert is present.
